Clinton’s libido = nation’s success?
[Interesting piece of hyperbolic rhetoric. Like the description of the Bush Cabinet… seriously, what a bunch of creeps. Powell must squirm every minute he is among them. As for Condi Rice, who can fathom her? -Thomas]
Is the country better off with a president who actually has an active libido? Hell yes.
By Mark Morford, SF Gate Columnist Wednesday, June 11, 2003
Bill Clinton was damn sexy. Oh yes he was. This is a given.
He had The Appeal. Magnetic, charming as hell, a man who you knew actually had sex and enjoyed it and possessed a highly active all-American libido and knew what all the body parts did and where they went, Hillary notwithstanding.
[…]
And then there’s his Cabinet. Bush is surrounded by what is quite possibly the least sexually tempting, most ogre-like cadre of bitter sagging hawks and scowling civil rights stompers in the history of humankind.
At least Clinton had Stephanopolous and Carville and Mike McCurry and hell even Gore had a sort of stiff bland GQ handsomeness. Bush has Ashcroft and Dick Cheney and Karl Rove and Ari Fleischer. Paint peels. Flowers wilt. Hide the children.
[…]